7/22/2023 0 Comments Manpower temporary services![]() The former type of restriction may logically be seen as a closely tailored method of protecting an employer's investment in an employee, in customer relations, and in good will. We have held that, generally, territorial restrictions relating to an employee's business locale will be enforced, while restrictions relating to an employer's business locale will not be enforced. She now claims that the restrictive covenant may not be enforced because it is not sufficiently specific in its terms.ฤก. Manpower successfully sought to enjoin her from working for the new agency. Crowe subsequently participated in the formation and daily conduct of a new temporary help agency in LaGrange. ![]() " Ms Crowe stopped working for Manpower in 1985 due to illness. Crowe also signed a "supplemental agreement" which appeared at the end of the employment agreement, in which she agreed to refrain from competition with Manpower for a period of a year after termination *240 of her employment in an area "within a 50 mile radius of any city in which there is a Manpower office or Manpower licensed business, other than the city where employed at the time. Crowe signed an employment agreement with Manpower in which she agreed to refrain for one year after termination of her employment with Manpower from engaging "in a business similar to within a radius of 50 miles of the city in which employed at the time of such termination." Ms. Crowe to cease work for Carlisle Work Force, and to abide by the restrictive covenant. The appellee, Manpower Temporary Services, sought to enjoin the appellant, Dorothy Crowe, from violating a restrictive covenant by working for a rival temporary help service in LaGrange.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |